Farsight Institute data — 62 sessions, of which 38 score above 0.95 on WSIM.
WSIM is Farsight's own scoring system, measuring agreement between viewers on the same target. It is computed by the Institute, not by an outside party — a high score means viewers agreed with each other, not that anyone checked them against the world.
Anthropological Documentation: This section archives remote viewing research as practice — what is done, how it is scored, and by whom. When the CIA had its own twenty-year programme evaluated in 1995, the two reviewers agreed the laboratory results were far beyond chance and disagreed about the cause: one read it as a real effect, the other as methodological flaws. The programme was ended because it had never produced intelligence anyone could act on. That unresolved split, not a verdict, is the honest state of the field, and it is the frame this section is read in.
NHI research from multiple sources - academic, whistleblower, and RV-derived data
Anthropological Documentation: This section catalogs claims about non-human intelligence from various researchers. We document these perspectives without claiming verification. The terminology (NHI) follows official UAP discourse. Approach as cultural anthropology of belief systems.